According to @ai_9684xtpa, an Ethena team multisig wallet 0x877...4bba6 transferred 15,000,000 ENA to a Binance deposit address, valued around 9.64 million USD at the reported time. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence. The transfer and address history are visible via Arkham Intelligence’s explorer for the cited wallet and the Binance-labeled recipient, confirming an exchange inflow of 15,000,000 ENA. Source: Arkham Intelligence; @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @EmberCN, about 15 million ENA worth roughly $9.64 million were transferred to Binance around 20 minutes ago by a wallet the source flags as possibly linked to Ethena. According to @EmberCN, the same wallet received 375 million ENA from Ethena’s multisig in July last year, valued near $166 million at the time. According to @EmberCN, today’s transfer is the wallet’s first outgoing transaction since receiving those tokens. According to @EmberCN, the wallet still holds about 360 million ENA valued around $230 million.

According to Onchain Lens, a whale deposited 1,962 ETH, valued at approximately $9.38 million, into OKX from address 0xf3c7D5b83DCf6F297E4B1f5A525C1a3eE45D5585 on August 25, 2025. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 25, 2025. The wallet held the ETH for over 11 months and realized about $4.7 million in profit; this implies an estimated cost basis near $2.39k per ETH, derived from the reported notional and profit figures. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Aug 25, 2025; calculation derived from Onchain Lens figures. Large exchange inflows are commonly tracked by traders as a potential sell-pressure proxy because moving coins to centralized exchanges increases readily sellable supply. Source: CryptoQuant Metrics Guide on Exchange Inflows; Glassnode Insights on Exchange Net Position Change. Traders can monitor OKX ETH order flow and broader ETH exchange netflows to gauge whether additional supply follows this deposit and to assess short-term liquidity and volatility risk. Source: CryptoQuant Metrics Guide on Exchange Flows; Glassnode Insights on Exchange Activity.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 1,962 ETH worth about $9.38M to OKX and realized approximately $4.7M in profit, with the sending address 0xf3c7D5b83DCf6F297E4B1f5A525C1a3eE45D5585, source: @OnchainLens. According to @OnchainLens, the ETH was reportedly held for over 11 years before the deposit, source: @OnchainLens. Large inflows to centralized exchanges are historically monitored as potential sell-side supply by on-chain analysts, so traders may watch OKX spot and derivatives flow around ETH for confirmation, source: Glassnode Academy.

According to @lookonchain, address 0xe0ba deposited 12M BIO, approximately $3.79M, to Binance after receiving 4.8M BIO, approximately $1.53M, from the BioProtocol vesting wallet about 40 minutes earlier, with the on-chain activity attributed to the address monitored via Arkham Intelligence as supporting evidence (source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence). @lookonchain also reports the same address withdrew 15M BIO from Binance five months ago at $0.057 and is now sitting on an estimated profit of $3.72M, a gain of about 436 percent, based on current valuations cited in the alert (source: Lookonchain on X). The cited USD amounts imply a current BIO spot near $0.318 to $0.319, derived from $3.79M for 12M BIO and $1.53M for 4.8M BIO, indicating a substantial price appreciation versus the $0.057 reference level (source: calculation from figures provided by Lookonchain on X). Large token deposits to exchanges are historically associated with increased near-term sell-side liquidity and distribution phases, making the 12M BIO inflow a key flow to monitor for potential market impact (source: Glassnode Insights research on exchange inflows and sell pressure). Traders tracking BIO can watch Binance order book depth and spot volumes to gauge whether the deposited 12M BIO begins to hit the market, as order book dynamics and volume shifts are standard tools for assessing flow-driven price impact (source: Binance Academy explainer on order book depth and volume analysis).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 1,400 ETH (about USD 6.63M) to Kraken and is up roughly USD 102M on the position. According to @OnchainLens, the address originally acquired 24,959 ETH for about USD 258K from Kraken and ShapeShift nine years ago and still holds 13,477 ETH (about USD 64.52M). According to @OnchainLens, 877 ETH from the holdings is in another wallet.

According to Lookonchain, multiple wallets labeled as linked to Matrixport deposited 95,873 ETH, valued at approximately $452 million, into Binance and OKX over the past three hours, with Arkham Intelligence address pages provided for verification (source: Lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). Arkham Intelligence labels indicate the sending wallets are associated with Matrixport and the receiving addresses are exchange deposit wallets for Binance and OKX, confirming centralized exchange inflows rather than self-custody transfers (source: Arkham Intelligence). The 95,873 ETH represents about 0.08% of Ethereum’s circulating supply, increasing near-term available liquidity on exchanges if sold (sources: Ultrasound.money for circulating supply; CryptoQuant metrics guide on exchange inflow as a proxy for potential sell pressure). Large, rapid exchange inflows are commonly monitored by traders for short-term price impact and potential shifts in funding and basis in ETH derivatives markets (sources: CryptoQuant metrics guide; Kaiko market structure research).

According to @EmberCN, 77,736 ETH worth about USD 368 million were transferred from address 0xfDFE into Bitfinex, flagged roughly 10 minutes after the move, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025. The same 77,736 ETH were originally withdrawn from Bitfinex in January 2019 when they were worth about USD 11.9 million, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025. The stash was sent into Bitfinex in February 2025 but was reported as not sold and subsequently withdrawn back on-chain before being fully transferred into Bitfinex again today, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025. Based on the values reported, the move implies an increase from roughly USD 11.9 million to roughly USD 368 million, about a 30x rise, with an implied per-ETH value shift from about USD 153 to about USD 4,735, source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 23, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, USV transferred 2.981 million UNI (~$31.09 million) to Coinbase Prime about 15 minutes prior to the source post and still holds 6.694 million UNI (~$69.82 million) at the referenced address; all figures and timing are cited from @EmberCN.

According to @EmberCN, HashKey Capital transferred 5.412 million MNT worth about $7.42 million into Bybit roughly 15 minutes before the post time on Aug 20, 2025, with the referenced on-chain address provided via intel.arkm.com (source: @EmberCN on X; source: Arkham Intelligence address explorer). @EmberCN adds that these MNT were originally withdrawn from Bybit to an on-chain address eight months earlier in Dec 2024 and are now moving back onto the exchange (source: @EmberCN on X). The notional value cited increased from $6.33 million at the time of withdrawal to $7.42 million now, a change of $1.09 million (source: @EmberCN on X). For trading, a 5.412 million MNT inflow increases immediately available supply on Bybit; traders typically monitor spot order-book depth, funding rates, and open interest around such deposits to assess liquidity and positioning (source: @EmberCN on X for the deposit details; source: Bybit market data and public API for order book and derivatives metrics).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 91GShr unstaked 98,291 SOL valued at approximately USD 17.83 million and deposited the entire amount to Binance about 30 minutes earlier, based on the Solscan transaction records referenced in the post (source: @lookonchain on X; Solscan account 91GShr at solscan.io/account/91GShr1DqQw8yN4hvztm2M4ujTqn4hKCNrV5wU8). According to @lookonchain, the provided Solscan link shows SOL movements matching the reported amounts and timing from wallet 91GShr to a Binance address, indicating a single-entity inflow of 98,291 SOL to a centralized exchange (source: @lookonchain on X; Solscan account 91GShr at solscan.io/account/91GShr1DqQw8yN4hvztm2M4ujTqn4hKCNrV5wU8).

According to @lookonchain, whale address 91GShr unstaked 98,291 SOL worth about $17.83M and deposited the entire amount to Binance roughly 30 minutes ago, per @lookonchain. This confirms a large on-exchange inflow for Solana SOL that is directly observable on-chain, per @lookonchain.

According to Lookonchain, a wallet labeled pumpfun deposited 2.5B PUMP valued at roughly 9.19M USD to the centralized exchange OKX about two hours ago, signaling a fresh exchange inflow for PUMP, source: Lookonchain on X, Arkham Intelligence explorer. Large token deposits to exchanges increase immediately tradable supply and are widely tracked for potential sell-side liquidity and short-term volatility, source: Glassnode Academy exchange inflows definitions, CryptoQuant exchange flow metrics. Traders can monitor OKX PUMP order-book depth, net inflow and outflow changes, and near-term price action to manage liquidity risk, source: OKX market data, CryptoQuant exchange flows.

According to @lookonchain, a wallet identified as pumpfun deposited 2.5B PUMP valued at $9.19M to OKX about 2 hours ago, with the transaction timing and size cited from on-chain monitoring by @lookonchain on X. Large exchange inflows increase on-exchange supply and are widely tracked by traders as a proxy for potential sell-side liquidity and short-term volatility risk, source: Glassnode Academy Exchange Inflows and CryptoQuant Research. Key confirmation metrics to monitor include OKX spot netflows, order book depth, and perpetual funding or basis signals for PUMP, source: OKX Learn and Binance Research.

According to @EmberCN, 2.5 billion PUMP worth about $9.19 million were transferred from the pumpdotfun token distribution address to OKX on Aug 18, 2025, indicating a sizable exchange inflow that traders track for liquidity shifts. Source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intel Explorer. Arkham labels identify the sender as the pumpdotfun distribution wallet and the recipient as an OKX address, corroborating the exchange-bound movement size and counterparties for on-chain verification. Source: Arkham Intel Explorer. Large inflows to centralized exchanges are commonly monitored as potential sell-side liquidity that can pressure prices in the short term, so traders often watch order book depth, exchange netflow, and market absorption on the destination venue following such transfers. Source: Binance Academy; CryptoQuant Metrics Glossary.

According to @OnchainLens, a tracked wallet unstaked 10,564 ETH (about $46.55M) from Mantle staking after two years, based on on-chain data shared in their post. According to @OnchainLens and the Arkham Intelligence address explorer link they referenced, the same wallet then deposited 10,819 ETH (about $47.79M) to Kraken. According to @OnchainLens, the address initially received 11,088 ETH worth $7.15M five years ago, implying a profit exceeding $40M as cited in their analysis.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain whale staked 10,000 ETH via Mantle liquid staking in January 2024, held for about 1.5 years, redeemed 10,564 ETH yesterday, and moved the funds to an exchange today (source: @EmberCN). The position’s value rose from $25.86M at deposit to $46.55M at redemption, yielding $20.68M in profit composed of roughly $18.2M from ETH price appreciation and about $2.48M from staking rewards (source: @EmberCN). The exchange-bound whale transfer was highlighted by @EmberCN as notable on-chain activity for ETH traders (source: @EmberCN).

According to @rovercrc, ARK Invest transferred 1,268 BTC valued at about $148.88 million into Coinbase, a large exchange deposit that traders may monitor for market impact, source: @rovercrc. Following this report by @rovercrc, traders are watching Coinbase spot order books, BTC price action, and the Coinbase premium versus other venues to gauge near-term liquidity and any emergent sell-side activity, source: @rovercrc. Based on the reported figures, the transfer-implied average value is roughly $117,500 per BTC (148.88M/1,268), which some traders use as a reference level for positioning and risk management after sizable inflows, following the report by @rovercrc.

According to @lookonchain, ARK Invest transferred 1,268 BTC worth about $148.88M to Coinbase roughly 30 minutes ago, constituting a large exchange inflow to the venue. Source: Lookonchain on X 2025-08-15 https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1956391687586205857. Large BTC deposits into exchanges are closely tracked because exchange inflows have historically aligned with increased sell-side liquidity and short-term volatility. Source: Glassnode Insights The Week Onchain series on Exchange Net Position Change https://insights.glassnode.com/the-week-onchain/. Traders should monitor BTC price action, Coinbase spot order books, and aggregate exchange net inflows for signs of supply pressure following such transfers. Source: CryptoQuant research on exchange inflows and price impact https://cryptoquant.com/quicktake/

According to @lookonchain, ARK Invest transferred 1,268 BTC (about $148.88 million) to Coinbase roughly 30 minutes before their post (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). The transaction was flagged using Arkham Intelligence entity labels that attribute the sender to ARK Invest and the recipient to Coinbase, confirming it as an exchange inflow rather than a self-custody move (source: Arkham Intelligence via @lookonchain). Large BTC deposits to centralized exchanges increase immediately available on-exchange supply and are monitored by traders as potential catalysts for short-term volatility (source: CryptoQuant). Near term, market participants commonly track Coinbase order book depth and the Coinbase Premium Index around such inflows to assess whether sell pressure materializes (source: CryptoQuant).